A steel security door is more than a steel door leaf and a lock. Its security performance depends on the complete door assembly, including the steel panels, frame, locking system, hinges and structural connections.
For B2B buyers, distributors, contractors and project developers, a test report can provide useful technical evidence when evaluating a security door supplier.
This article reviews a test report for a Class A steel security door (甲级钢质防盗门). The tested sample was approximately 2150 × 980 mm and was evaluated according to GB 17565-2007, General Specification for Burglary Resistant Safety Door. The report records an overall qualified result for the tested sample.
Important: The report was issued in December 2022 under GB 17565-2007. That standard has since been replaced by GB 17565-2022, which came into effect on January 1, 2024. Therefore, this report should be understood as technical test evidence for the specific sample tested at that time, rather than as a statement of current compliance with GB 17565-2022.
The report provides the following basic information about the tested steel security door:
| Item | Test Report Details |
|---|---|
| Product | Steel Security Door |
| Security Grade | Class A / 甲级 |
| Sample Size | Approx. 2150 × 980 mm |
| Test Standard | GB 17565-2007 |
| Report No. | J22-002220 |
| Overall Conclusion | Qualified |
The report was issued by the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Testing Institute of Product Quality.
The information above describes the specific sample and test configuration recorded in the report. It should not be interpreted as applying automatically to every steel security door model or every customized configuration.
The steel construction of the tested door was one of the measured technical items.
The report records the following measured steel thicknesses:
| Component | Required Thickness in Report | Measured Result |
|---|---|---|
| Door Frame | 2.00 mm | 1.94 mm |
| Outer Door Panel | 1.00 mm | 1.12 mm |
| Inner Door Panel | 1.00 mm | 0.88 mm |
The results were recorded as qualified according to the applicable requirements for the tested sample.
The report also describes the sample as a fully enclosed steel security door. The door structure included steel panels, a steel frame, a multi-point locking system and reinforced protection around the lock installation area.
For B2B sourcing, steel thickness should be considered together with the frame construction, reinforcement, locking system and hinge configuration rather than used as the sole indicator of security performance.
The tested product is identified in the report as a Class A steel security door.
The report's security-grade item was judged qualified against the applicable requirements of GB 17565-2007.
It is important to understand what this classification means.
Class A / 甲级 in this report refers to the security classification under the Chinese standard used for the test. It should not be assumed to be a universal international security classification or directly equated with security ratings used in other countries.
For international projects, buyers should always confirm which security standard and performance requirements apply in the destination market.
The locking system is one of the most important structural components of a steel security door.
According to the report, the tested door had:
The report records the locking-system requirements as qualified.
The multi-point configuration distributes the locking points along the door assembly instead of relying only on a single central locking position.
For project buyers, this makes the locking configuration an important specification to confirm when comparing different steel security door models.
Anti-destructive performance is a major part of the test report.
The report includes a specified 30-minute destructive-resistance test for key parts of the door assembly.
The test included destructive methods applied to the locking area under the conditions specified in the standard.
The report records the lock-related anti-destructive performance as:
Qualified
The hinge side of the door was also evaluated through the specified destructive test procedure.
The report records the hinge-related anti-destructive performance as:
Qualified
These results indicate that the tested sample met the applicable anti-destructive requirements recorded in the report.
They should not be interpreted as a guarantee that every possible attack method or every customized door configuration will produce the same result.
The report also evaluates several dimensional and assembly-related characteristics.
The recorded results include:
| Measurement | Test Result | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|
| Door leaf diagonal deviation | 1.0 mm | Qualified |
| Door leaf/frame fitting gap | 2.2 mm | Qualified |
| Lock tongue/lock seat gap | 1.4 mm | Qualified |
| Door leaf/frame active fitting gap | 3.0 mm | Qualified |
| Locking-point surface flatness | 22 mm | Qualified |
These measurements are relevant to the manufacturing accuracy and assembly of the tested door.
Proper dimensional control helps ensure that the door leaf, frame, locking system and hinges work together as designed.
For OEM projects, the final dimensions and tolerances should be confirmed against the project drawings and installation conditions before production.
In addition to anti-destructive testing, the report includes several mechanical performance tests.
The tested door recorded a residual deformation of:
2.2 mm
The result was judged qualified.
The reported deformation after the specified end-impact test was:
1.2 mm
The result was also judged qualified.
The hinge flexibility test was recorded as:
Qualified
The report further records that the hinge could maintain the required operating performance under the specified test conditions.
These results provide additional technical information about the mechanical behavior of the tested door assembly.
The report includes a specific lock protection requirement.
It records a reinforced steel protection plate around the lock installation area and evaluates the locking system against the applicable requirements.
The report also records:
16 locking points, including 14 horizontal locking bolts and 2 vertical locking bolts.
The locking-point quantity exceeded the minimum requirement stated in the report, and the overall locking-system item was judged qualified.
For security door sourcing, buyers should look beyond the lock brand alone and evaluate the complete locking structure, including the lock body, locking points, reinforced areas and connection with the door frame.
The report also includes an electrical safety section.
However, the tested sample had no electrical components, so the electrical safety test was recorded as not applicable.
This distinction is important when reading a technical report.
A professional test-report review should distinguish between:
Rather than presenting every item as a product performance claim.
A test report is useful only when its scope is understood correctly.
This distinction is particularly important for international B2B buyers.
When a project has specific security requirements, the supplier should confirm the exact model, materials, hardware, dimensions and applicable standards before production.
The test report was issued under GB 17565-2007.
According to China's National Standard Information Public Service Platform, GB 17565-2007 was officially replaced by GB 17565-2022, which was published on December 1, 2022 and implemented on January 1, 2024. GB 17565-2007 is now listed as withdrawn.
This means that the report remains useful as a historical technical record of the tested sample, but it should not be presented as evidence that the same product configuration currently complies with the latest standard.
For new projects requiring compliance with current Chinese requirements, buyers should request documentation applicable to the current GB 17565-2022 standard.
For export projects, additional local or project-specific requirements may also apply.
A reliable security door supplier should be evaluated based on more than product appearance or a single specification.
Confirm the steel panel thickness, door frame construction and internal reinforcement.
Check the number and configuration of locking points, lock protection and the connection between the lock and door frame.
The hinge side should provide appropriate structural support alongside the locking side.
Confirm which standard was used for testing and whether it is applicable to the current project.
Check whether the tested sample has the same dimensions, materials, hardware and construction as the production model.
For new projects, request the latest applicable test reports, certificates and technical specifications where required.
Security requirements can vary by country, building type and application. Fire resistance, acoustic performance, thermal insulation, weather resistance and other requirements may need separate documentation.
For this reason, a test report should be treated as one part of the supplier evaluation process, rather than the only qualification criterion.
For international B2B projects, steel security doors may need to be customized according to project drawings, dimensions, finishes, hardware and installation requirements.
As a professional door manufacturer, Zonle Doors supports OEM and project-based door production and can discuss specifications according to the requirements of distributors, contractors, developers and other commercial buyers.
Depending on the project, buyers can discuss:
Before production, the final door configuration should be confirmed against the project's technical specifications and applicable local standards.
A Class A steel security door, or 甲级钢质防盗门, is a steel security door classified according to the applicable security-door standard. In the test report discussed in this article, the tested sample was identified as Class A under GB 17565-2007 and received a qualified result.
The tested sample had a measured door-frame thickness of 1.94 mm, an outer door panel thickness of 1.12 mm and an inner door panel thickness of 0.88 mm. The reported results were judged qualified against the applicable requirements.
The report records 16 locking points, consisting of 14 horizontal locking bolts and 2 vertical locking bolts. The main locking points were recorded at 26 mm in length.
No. The report was issued according to GB 17565-2007 in December 2022. GB 17565-2007 was subsequently replaced by GB 17565-2022, which took effect on January 1, 2024.
Yes. Steel security doors can be specified according to project requirements, including dimensions, finishes, hardware and locking configurations. For compliance-sensitive projects, the final configuration and applicable standards should be confirmed before production.
A Class A steel security door should be evaluated as a complete door system rather than by steel thickness or appearance alone.
The test report reviewed in this article documents a Class A steel security door sample tested under GB 17565-2007, with qualified results covering steel construction, dimensional requirements, locking configuration, anti-destructive performance and mechanical performance.
The tested sample featured a 16-point locking system, measured steel thicknesses of 1.94 mm for the door frame, 1.12 mm for the outer panel and 0.88 mm for the inner panel, and qualified results in the specified anti-destructive and mechanical tests.
At the same time, the report dates from 2022 and is based on a standard that has since been replaced. For current projects, buyers should always verify the latest applicable standards and documentation for the exact door configuration being supplied.
Looking for a steel security door manufacturer for your next project? Contact Zonle Doors to discuss OEM specifications, customization and bulk project requirements.
Get Factory Price
Technical Reference
Test Report No. J22-002220 — Steel Security Door, Class A, tested according to GB 17565-2007.